← Back to context Comment by vidarh 5 days ago My point exactly. The person I replied to did just that. 2 comments vidarh Reply ivraatiems 5 days ago I think the parent is trying to point out the difference between our positions:You say the limits of LLMs don't matter, because we don't have definitions strong enough to describe them.I say the limits of LLMs do matter and the fact that we can't yet define them rigorously means we aren't able to fix them (assuming we want to). vidarh 1 day ago No, that is categorically not what I said.
ivraatiems 5 days ago I think the parent is trying to point out the difference between our positions:You say the limits of LLMs don't matter, because we don't have definitions strong enough to describe them.I say the limits of LLMs do matter and the fact that we can't yet define them rigorously means we aren't able to fix them (assuming we want to). vidarh 1 day ago No, that is categorically not what I said.
I think the parent is trying to point out the difference between our positions:
You say the limits of LLMs don't matter, because we don't have definitions strong enough to describe them.
I say the limits of LLMs do matter and the fact that we can't yet define them rigorously means we aren't able to fix them (assuming we want to).
No, that is categorically not what I said.