← Back to context Comment by pjmlp 16 hours ago Not sure if this is a good idea given how ISO has been going for programming languages. 3 comments pjmlp Reply maxloh 12 hours ago Yeah. I think the ISO process would likely slow down the development of the ISA. muvlon 12 hours ago Not only that, it might turn RISC-V from a specification freely available under a FOSS license into a proprietary standard that you have to pay 285 CHF (~$350) to buy a non-transferable license for. aleatorianator 11 hours ago ah, yes. OPEN like science or AI
maxloh 12 hours ago Yeah. I think the ISO process would likely slow down the development of the ISA. muvlon 12 hours ago Not only that, it might turn RISC-V from a specification freely available under a FOSS license into a proprietary standard that you have to pay 285 CHF (~$350) to buy a non-transferable license for. aleatorianator 11 hours ago ah, yes. OPEN like science or AI
muvlon 12 hours ago Not only that, it might turn RISC-V from a specification freely available under a FOSS license into a proprietary standard that you have to pay 285 CHF (~$350) to buy a non-transferable license for. aleatorianator 11 hours ago ah, yes. OPEN like science or AI
Yeah. I think the ISO process would likely slow down the development of the ISA.
Not only that, it might turn RISC-V from a specification freely available under a FOSS license into a proprietary standard that you have to pay 285 CHF (~$350) to buy a non-transferable license for.
ah, yes. OPEN like science or AI