← Back to context Comment by mimsee 14 hours ago "According to Wikipedia..." aargh Wikipedia is not the source! 2 comments mimsee Reply immibis 11 hours ago Maybe in 2005, but in 2025, Wikipedia is more reliably accurate than many more-official-sounding sources. ktallett 13 hours ago I mean Wikipedia is referenced and well sourced so it is a perfectly valid source in this day and age. I read papers weekly and they are full of more lies or dishonesty than Wikipedia nowadays where there is a desire to publish often.
immibis 11 hours ago Maybe in 2005, but in 2025, Wikipedia is more reliably accurate than many more-official-sounding sources.
ktallett 13 hours ago I mean Wikipedia is referenced and well sourced so it is a perfectly valid source in this day and age. I read papers weekly and they are full of more lies or dishonesty than Wikipedia nowadays where there is a desire to publish often.
Maybe in 2005, but in 2025, Wikipedia is more reliably accurate than many more-official-sounding sources.
I mean Wikipedia is referenced and well sourced so it is a perfectly valid source in this day and age. I read papers weekly and they are full of more lies or dishonesty than Wikipedia nowadays where there is a desire to publish often.