← Back to context

Comment by zoobab

13 hours ago

Notarization means they still have a say on which app is allowed to run or not.

This goes against the spirit of the DMA, which was supposed to 'open up' 3rd party stores.

The European Commission does not seem to care atm that Apple is still the gatekeeper.

The European Commission does not seem to care atm that Apple is still the gatekeeper.

I think the European Commission is threading the needle, trying to find a path to uphold the DMA/DSA while not provoking another tariff war.

  • I think they prefer to have Apple accountable for everything that happens on Apple devices too. You can't pressure Apple into removing an app when they have to give up the only option to enforce that.

  • > I think the European Commission is threading the needle, trying to find a path to uphold the DMA/DSA while not provoking another tariff war.

    The EC is also under a lot of internal pressure from member states to calm down on the regulation, as it's considered one reason why Europe is such a bad place to do a tech startup right now.

    • > The EC is also under a lot of internal pressure from member states to calm down on the regulation, as it's considered one reason why Europe is such a bad place to do a tech startup right now.

      Turns out then using private data for ads (Google) and acting like a middleman (Apple) are apparently lucrative and worth money?

      (This isn't a critique to you OP or your comment, but rather a commentary on the 21st century.)

      4 replies →

Notarization is an automated process at the very least, and just speculation, but since entitlements are baked into the codesigning step, it seems meant to prevent software from granting itself entitlements Apple doesn't want 3rd parties having access to.

  • Notarization is automatic, but the European app store still requires a full review by a human.