Comment by bronlund
6 hours ago
I wasn't aware of that, thanks. But still, if you go buy a car right now, I doubt they are going to make it a sales pitch that you are not the only one who can control your car.
6 hours ago
I wasn't aware of that, thanks. But still, if you go buy a car right now, I doubt they are going to make it a sales pitch that you are not the only one who can control your car.
This is why we invented the fine print.
Not putting this information in the fine print is fraudulent behaviour
There are limits to what can be put into the fine print as well. We probably need to revisit though rules, but you can't get away with anything just by putting it in the fine print.
It was most likely in the specs from the beginning. You can't have busses roaming around with no way to turn them off remotely.
"You can't have busses roaming around with no way to turn them off remotely."
Hm? Not a single bus on the road in my city can be turned off remotely. There's never been one ever, since bus transport started. So why should, no, must, that be a feature of new buses?
I’m pretty sure turning off the bus is something the bus driver can do. It’s not like buses were wildly roaming around before cellular networks were invented…
Yes, those wild buses on the loose have been a major problem
1 reply →
Can't you? And who should have that power? I believe that this is the concern.
What? That's the way it's always been.
Do you imagine some benevolent authority sits in your town with a finger on the kill switch for every vehicle in motion?
If it were in the specs from the beginning, there would be no issue. This isn't a "click here to accept" thing; multiple people scan the technical data in these projects.
Better than a bus that are blown up if it goes under 50 mph.