Comment by jimbokun
5 hours ago
So Ruby is Smalltalk but amenable to modern development practices and tools like source control and off the shelf text editors, and usable for Unix scripts.
5 hours ago
So Ruby is Smalltalk but amenable to modern development practices and tools like source control and off the shelf text editors, and usable for Unix scripts.
Ruby isn't Smalltalk. The only thing Ruby inherited from it is the pure object model. Everything else was cribbed from other languages. Ruby doesn't have what makes Smalltalk great, the image-based development model.
I'm making my own text editor in Ruby now, as I'm wishing for a more Smalltalk-like experience with it. There's just so much missing. Ruby has the reflective capability to enjoy a Smalltalk-like IDE, but Rails took over and drove Ruby in that direction long before anyone could cook one up.
Which is a shame, IDEs that aren't Smalltalk / Lisp haven't graduated past the need for static analysis despite having 50 years to do so. Now it's the red-headed stepchild of languages due to no fault of its own.
Ruby is like Smalltalk, but with some Perl (for good or bad) mixed in too IMO.
Basically yes.