Comment by HeavyStorm

I get your point and I understand it, but the OP argument is an anecdote, right? It loses force if it incorporates two opposites like this.

Reading it, what I understood was: ah, so Brenda is safe - co-pilot will screw up, she will point it out and management will learn not to trust the bot.

And what I believe OP intended is "Brenda will lose her job!"

What I think I mean is: yes, both are valid, but conflating both in a single anecdote sounds bad.