Comment by xxs
6 days ago
you cut the statement in the middle, it's very obviously in terms of bytecode as we talk about bytecode generation.
6 days ago
you cut the statement in the middle, it's very obviously in terms of bytecode as we talk about bytecode generation.
Mo, we were talking about what would be reasonable semantics for the interaction of two features in a high-level programming language Java; the semantics of bytecode doesn't really matter in this case. The precedent for that would be that "finally"m in fact, really doesn't mesh all that well with what is available for bytecode, so javac has to resort to code duplication.