← Back to context

Comment by carlosjobim

14 hours ago

> What makes you say that?

Because the group of men fit to fight such a war would rather rebel against the government than fight a brother war. From lowest recruit to highest general.

Much as is the case in the US and Canada, families and friends transcend the borders of Ukraine and Russia. That wasn't enough to stop the Russian invasion of Ukraine. While Americans enjoy much, much broader freedoms of expression (albeit that's also under great threat), I wouldn't imagine the reaction from our American "brothers" would be much different from Russian when it invaded its "brother".

Your use of "brother" is apt. There's a Ukrainian joke that goes something like:

"A Ukrainian man and a Russian man are walking together. They happen upon a $20 bill on the sidewalk. The Russian man says, 'Let us share it as brothers'. The Ukranian man says 'No, let us share it equally'".

  • I guess we'll find out when it happens (or not happens).

    The only realistic scenario I can think of when your American "brothers" would go to war across the border is if the Canadian government commences war against its own population. Then I could see the US government intervening, or US fighters independent from the government taking sides in Canada.

    • And where do you think the idea the Canadian government is waging war against its own population will come from?

      The problem is that most people think of these scenarios as something that happens overnight, when in reality consent is manufactured over time. There's a reason you don't microwave a frog.

how are they handling being deployed to US cities right now? I think they could be swayed into it with the right rhetoric.

  • The US military being deployed is doing things like cleaning up trash, guarding federal buildings, and otherwise goofing off. There's zero indication they'd be easily swayed. Reserve Generals have directly stated they will defend the state, not follow the Presidents orders.