If you hire a house cleaner to clean your house, and the cleaner didn't do well, would you eject yourself out of the house? You would not. You would change to a new cleaner.
But if we hire someone to deal on R&D to automate fully the house cleaning process, we might not necessarily expect the office to be maintained in clean state by the researchers themselves any time we enter the room.
As far as an analogy, whatever happens, whoever messes up, Zuck, as the owner, of course, takes the final blame.
That's why he is changing the team.
Still, people bring up this weird point that would be equivalent to you giving up your house equity for free because you fucked up on hiring and managing your house.
I think he means Zuckerberg himself, the metaverse isn't exactly a major success, but this is a false equivalency the way he organized it only his vote matters he does what he wants
If you hire a house cleaner to clean your house, and the cleaner didn't do well, would you eject yourself out of the house? You would not. You would change to a new cleaner.
But if we hire someone to deal on R&D to automate fully the house cleaning process, we might not necessarily expect the office to be maintained in clean state by the researchers themselves any time we enter the room.
As far as an analogy, whatever happens, whoever messes up, Zuck, as the owner, of course, takes the final blame.
That's why he is changing the team.
Still, people bring up this weird point that would be equivalent to you giving up your house equity for free because you fucked up on hiring and managing your house.
Sure, but that "someone else" is the man writing the checks. If the roles were reversed, he'd be the one being fired now.
Who are you referring to?
I think he means Zuckerberg himself, the metaverse isn't exactly a major success, but this is a false equivalency the way he organized it only his vote matters he does what he wants