← Back to context

Comment by pton_xd

13 hours ago

> People may well have a fuzzy idea of how their credit card works, but how it really works is formally defined by financial institutions.

> Our probabilistic, fuzzy concepts are often simply a misconception.

How eg a credit card works today is defined by financial institutions. How it might work tomorrow is defined by politics, incentives, and human action. It's not clear how to model those with formal language.

I think most systems we interact with are fuzzy because they are in a continual state of change due to the aforementioned human society factors.

To some degree I think that our widely used formal languages may just be insufficient and could be improved to better describe change.

But ultimately I agree with you that this entire societal process is just categorically different. It's simply not a description or definition of something, and therefore the question of how formal it can be doesn't really make sense.

Formalisms are tools for a specific but limited purpose. I think we need those tools. Trying to replace them with something fuzzy makes no sense to me either.