← Back to context Comment by NewJazz 3 months ago Corporate personhood isn't required for the first amendment to apply to the nytimes. 3 comments NewJazz Reply ashdksnndck 3 months ago The NYTimes is a corporation. Corporate personhood is the term of art that we use when the legal person a right applies to is a corporation. NewJazz 3 months ago "We" ashdksnndck 3 months ago Ok, there’s the terminology used by the legal community (including all nine justices on the Supreme Court) and then there’s people who dislike the terminology because they saw a misleading speech about the issue on the Daily Show.
ashdksnndck 3 months ago The NYTimes is a corporation. Corporate personhood is the term of art that we use when the legal person a right applies to is a corporation. NewJazz 3 months ago "We" ashdksnndck 3 months ago Ok, there’s the terminology used by the legal community (including all nine justices on the Supreme Court) and then there’s people who dislike the terminology because they saw a misleading speech about the issue on the Daily Show.
NewJazz 3 months ago "We" ashdksnndck 3 months ago Ok, there’s the terminology used by the legal community (including all nine justices on the Supreme Court) and then there’s people who dislike the terminology because they saw a misleading speech about the issue on the Daily Show.
ashdksnndck 3 months ago Ok, there’s the terminology used by the legal community (including all nine justices on the Supreme Court) and then there’s people who dislike the terminology because they saw a misleading speech about the issue on the Daily Show.
The NYTimes is a corporation. Corporate personhood is the term of art that we use when the legal person a right applies to is a corporation.
"We"
Ok, there’s the terminology used by the legal community (including all nine justices on the Supreme Court) and then there’s people who dislike the terminology because they saw a misleading speech about the issue on the Daily Show.