Comment by systemerror
5 hours ago
Why does air-gapped environment require rolling your own CI/CD solution? Plenty of examples of air-gapped Jenkins and/or Argo Workflows. Was this just an educational exercise?
5 hours ago
Why does air-gapped environment require rolling your own CI/CD solution? Plenty of examples of air-gapped Jenkins and/or Argo Workflows. Was this just an educational exercise?
Jenkins sucks but is insanely reliable
Argo Workflows does not live up to what they advertise, it is so much more complex to setup and then build workflows for. Helm + Argo is pain (both use the same template delimiters...)
Jenkins, like many tools with extreme flexibility, sucks as much as you make it suck. You can pretty easily turn Jenkins into a monstrosity that makes everyone afraid to ever try to update it. On the other hand, you can also have a pretty solid setup that is easy to work on. The trouble is that the tool itself doesn't guide you much to the good path, so unless you've seen a pleasant Jenkins instance before you're likely to have a worse time than necessary.
Are you sure, because last time I used Jenkins it actively sucked. The interface was a total mess and it doesn't surface results in any useful way.
It seems like a simple CI/CD in an airgapped environment might be simpler to implement than to (1) learn and (2) onboard an off-the-shelf solution when your airgapped requirement limits your ability to leverage the off-the-shelf ecosystem.
This was more like an educational exercise
Since you're exercising, you can take it to the next level where you don't specify the next step but the inputs to each task, allowing you to infer the DAG and implement caching...
You can do this with cue/flow, but have not turned it into a full CI system. The building blocks are there
1 reply →