← Back to context

Comment by cowpig

4 hours ago

I think they get way more "engagement" from people who use it as their friend, and the end goal of subverting social media and creating the most powerful (read: profitable) influence engine on earth makes a lot of sense if you are a soulless ghoul.

It would be pretty dystopian when we get to the point where ChatGPT pushed (unannounced) advertisements to those people (the ones forming a parasocial relationship with it). Imagine someone complaining they're depressed and ChatGPT proposing doing XYZ activity which is actually a disguised ad.

Other than such scenarios, that "engagement" would be just useless and actually costing them more money than it makes

  • Do you have reason to believe they are not doing this already?

    • No, otherwise Sam Altman wouldn’t have had a outburst about revenue. They know that they have this amazing system, but they haven’t quite figured out how to monetize it yet.

    • Not really, but with the amounts of money they're bleeding it's bound to get worse if they are already doing it.