← Back to context Comment by nutjob2 6 hours ago Your second sentence contradicts your first. 2 comments nutjob2 Reply troupo 5 hours ago Pray tell how it contradicts the first.Just note: human pattern matching is not Haskell/Erlang/ML pattern matching. It doesn't go [1] through all possible matches of every possible combination of all available criteria[1] If it does, it's the most powerful computing device imaginable. antonvs 1 hour ago > [1] If it does, it's the most powerful computing device imaginable.Well, my brain perhaps. Not sure about the rest of y'all.
troupo 5 hours ago Pray tell how it contradicts the first.Just note: human pattern matching is not Haskell/Erlang/ML pattern matching. It doesn't go [1] through all possible matches of every possible combination of all available criteria[1] If it does, it's the most powerful computing device imaginable. antonvs 1 hour ago > [1] If it does, it's the most powerful computing device imaginable.Well, my brain perhaps. Not sure about the rest of y'all.
antonvs 1 hour ago > [1] If it does, it's the most powerful computing device imaginable.Well, my brain perhaps. Not sure about the rest of y'all.
Pray tell how it contradicts the first.
Just note: human pattern matching is not Haskell/Erlang/ML pattern matching. It doesn't go [1] through all possible matches of every possible combination of all available criteria
[1] If it does, it's the most powerful computing device imaginable.
> [1] If it does, it's the most powerful computing device imaginable.
Well, my brain perhaps. Not sure about the rest of y'all.