← Back to context Comment by theoldgreybeard 3 months ago FreeBSD is worth using for native ZFS alone. BTRFS doesn't even come close. 5 comments theoldgreybeard Reply sbseitz 3 months ago It’s all OpenZFS now, same as Linux lmao. tcmart14 3 months ago Yes and no. OpenZFS on Linux still isn't as seamless and most distros still don't make it easy to do ZFS on root. Its definitely gotten better though. akimbostrawman 3 months ago I don't see any reason to use traditional ZFS on root when ZFSBootMenu is easier and better, also comparable to BSD's boot menus. 1 reply → theoldgreybeard 3 months ago It's still out-of-tree though, isn't it?
sbseitz 3 months ago It’s all OpenZFS now, same as Linux lmao. tcmart14 3 months ago Yes and no. OpenZFS on Linux still isn't as seamless and most distros still don't make it easy to do ZFS on root. Its definitely gotten better though. akimbostrawman 3 months ago I don't see any reason to use traditional ZFS on root when ZFSBootMenu is easier and better, also comparable to BSD's boot menus. 1 reply → theoldgreybeard 3 months ago It's still out-of-tree though, isn't it?
tcmart14 3 months ago Yes and no. OpenZFS on Linux still isn't as seamless and most distros still don't make it easy to do ZFS on root. Its definitely gotten better though. akimbostrawman 3 months ago I don't see any reason to use traditional ZFS on root when ZFSBootMenu is easier and better, also comparable to BSD's boot menus. 1 reply →
akimbostrawman 3 months ago I don't see any reason to use traditional ZFS on root when ZFSBootMenu is easier and better, also comparable to BSD's boot menus. 1 reply →
It’s all OpenZFS now, same as Linux lmao.
Yes and no. OpenZFS on Linux still isn't as seamless and most distros still don't make it easy to do ZFS on root. Its definitely gotten better though.
I don't see any reason to use traditional ZFS on root when ZFSBootMenu is easier and better, also comparable to BSD's boot menus.
1 reply →
It's still out-of-tree though, isn't it?