Comment by kridsdale1
8 days ago
Maybe try including “f/16” or “f/22” as those are likely to be in the training set for long depth of field photos.
8 days ago
Maybe try including “f/16” or “f/22” as those are likely to be in the training set for long depth of field photos.
I tried that but they don't seem to make much difference for whatever reason, you still can't get a crisp shot such as this [0] where the foreground and background details are all preserved (linked shot was taken with an iPhone which doesn't seem to do shallow depth of field unless you use their portrait mode).
[0] https://www.lux.camera/content/images/size/w1600/2024/09/IMG...
Those are rarely in the captions for the image. They'd have to extract the EXIF for photos and include it in recaptioning. Which they should be doing, but I doubt they thought about it.
Photo sites like Flickr do extract EXIF data and show it next to the image, but who knows if the scraping picked them up.
Looks like specific f-stops don't actually make a difference for stable diffusion at least: https://old.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1adgcf3/co...