← Back to context Comment by 1970-01-01 3 days ago Was this written by AI?If not, why not? 3 comments 1970-01-01 Reply hmokiguess 3 days ago Maybe? Why maybe, well, I’d say both AI and their PR team. Why both? Well, because why not? 1970-01-01 3 days ago What I mean is this is a bread and butter application for their product. I would be concerned if nothing written was AI generated. If both humans and AI vibed on the article, then what ratio was dog-feeding and what still needs an editor? nkrisc 3 days ago I think they’re asking because if it’s not good enough for them, why is it good enough for anyone else?
hmokiguess 3 days ago Maybe? Why maybe, well, I’d say both AI and their PR team. Why both? Well, because why not? 1970-01-01 3 days ago What I mean is this is a bread and butter application for their product. I would be concerned if nothing written was AI generated. If both humans and AI vibed on the article, then what ratio was dog-feeding and what still needs an editor? nkrisc 3 days ago I think they’re asking because if it’s not good enough for them, why is it good enough for anyone else?
1970-01-01 3 days ago What I mean is this is a bread and butter application for their product. I would be concerned if nothing written was AI generated. If both humans and AI vibed on the article, then what ratio was dog-feeding and what still needs an editor?
nkrisc 3 days ago I think they’re asking because if it’s not good enough for them, why is it good enough for anyone else?
Maybe? Why maybe, well, I’d say both AI and their PR team. Why both? Well, because why not?
What I mean is this is a bread and butter application for their product. I would be concerned if nothing written was AI generated. If both humans and AI vibed on the article, then what ratio was dog-feeding and what still needs an editor?
I think they’re asking because if it’s not good enough for them, why is it good enough for anyone else?