Comment by pseudalopex
3 months ago
> It's still crap, but it outperforms the real thing of look and feel as well as general language skills while it underperforms in the part that matters.
The real thing meant human SEO spam? Or human writing?
3 months ago
> It's still crap, but it outperforms the real thing of look and feel as well as general language skills while it underperforms in the part that matters.
The real thing meant human SEO spam? Or human writing?
Actual knowledge and understanding.
> It's still crap, but it outperforms Actual knowledge and understanding of look and feel as well as general language skills while it underperforms in the part that matters.
I would think this meant AI generated pages performed better in search engines but looked, felt, used language, and informed worse. But you said the crap looks good.