← Back to context

Comment by gf000

7 hours ago

It's especially funny considering that this issue has been known from lisps for 50+ years..

They can fix the issue by just changing the semantics of "for-range" loops, almost no negative effects. But they also applied the change to 3-clause-for loops, which causes many problems, some of which have been pointed out before the change was made. So the rookie mistake is totally caused by arrogance.