← Back to context Comment by shuraman7 11 hours ago are you for real? Rust most definitely is not highly readable and the language reeks of complexity 3 comments shuraman7 Reply danielheath 9 hours ago Readable is relative; it’s much less readable than some languages, but much more than the ones it’s largely displacing.I would much rather try and figure out a bug in unfamiliar rust than in unfamiliar cpp. echelon 7 hours ago It's comparable with Java.It's significantly easier to parse than C++. hu3 3 hours ago Java doesn't have lifetimes. So no.And C++ can only be beaten by the likes of K, J and brainfuck. Very low bar to clear.
danielheath 9 hours ago Readable is relative; it’s much less readable than some languages, but much more than the ones it’s largely displacing.I would much rather try and figure out a bug in unfamiliar rust than in unfamiliar cpp.
echelon 7 hours ago It's comparable with Java.It's significantly easier to parse than C++. hu3 3 hours ago Java doesn't have lifetimes. So no.And C++ can only be beaten by the likes of K, J and brainfuck. Very low bar to clear.
hu3 3 hours ago Java doesn't have lifetimes. So no.And C++ can only be beaten by the likes of K, J and brainfuck. Very low bar to clear.
Readable is relative; it’s much less readable than some languages, but much more than the ones it’s largely displacing.
I would much rather try and figure out a bug in unfamiliar rust than in unfamiliar cpp.
It's comparable with Java.
It's significantly easier to parse than C++.
Java doesn't have lifetimes. So no.
And C++ can only be beaten by the likes of K, J and brainfuck. Very low bar to clear.