← Back to context

Comment by wizzwizz4

5 hours ago

> it's making a web that is able to occupy the same privileged position on the Internet that is difficult.

Interestingly, Facebook managed that, too. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet.org

Net neutrality is kind of a different thing with wireless services than wired ones. I certainly wouldn’t want Facebook to be the entire Internet for me, but if someone wants to run an Internet-like wireless network and someone else wants to pay to be a part of it, it’s not necessarily harmful to them or me. It would be the only realistic medium for something better than the Internet to take off without being physically dependent on the legacy Internet.