Thank you so much everyone, this is something I've worked on for a few years on and off -- I posted about it here in a Show HN a few hours ago [0]
The biggest unlock was finding Willy McAllister's excellent Circuit Sandbox [1], which provides the Minivac Simulator's underlying electrical math. I tried so many approaches to simulate electricity (a doomed DIY approach, Falstad, Spice...) but Circuit Sandbox's DC analysis did the job perfectly.
Ping me for questions, and would love to read your feedback!
I totally feel you - the one reservation is that I’m using (gasp) not the original Minivac Relay sound. I need to go to a Computer Museum that will let me record one to offer a more authentic simulated experience.
So tldr - let me get a clean real sound and then we can come back to this question :)
It's almost hard to believe this is possible now in a modern web browser. It's a really sublime thing and I'm glad someone figured out a way to do this. I remember Web 1.0 before the days of JavaScript and P.H.P. allowed interactive websites... Indeed, it's entirely different now.
When you attach a name as inventor of something, it sounds as if the whole concept was borne by them, which is not true. All "inventors" and "great leaders" are only carriers of incremental change, which sometimes marks a milestone for a series of changes done by their predecessors or the context.
Steam engine concepts were already there before Jame Watt, logic by electrical circuits was already there before Shannon. People provide incremental guidance for the change, like river banks do to the flow of the river. No single part of the river brought the river upto that point.
There are many cases when the incremental change that is due to an individual inventor is very clearly defined, so it is known precisely which is the contribution beyond what was inherited from the predecessors.
For that incremental change, the name of its inventor is appropriate.
However, you are right that too frequently people fail to distinguish what was new and what was old in an invention, and they misleadingly attach the name of the inventor/discoverer to the entire big system or theory, not to the small features that are truly new.
The inventors or discoverers are frequently guilty of this themselves, by failing to properly acknowledge their sources and by making exaggerated patent claims, which nowadays are too frequently accepted by patent offices that do not perform an adequate search of prior art.
well the fact that you can wire the Rotary Switch to power and the thing physically rotates --- that's definitely Haptic Feedback that i dont ever recall seeing in a computer. lol.
that manual is wild too. entire section on games.
reminds me a lot of those old radioshack "build your own circuit" boards. the wires to components especially but also the manual, the way it just builds up dozens of examples from simple to complex, so if you really wanted to, a child could work their way through it slowly and understand everything.
looks like the inflation adjusted cost would be around 900 bucks today.
The Rotary Switch - which is both input and output in the real Minivac - is absolutely wild yeah.
One of the crucial things I didn't get to yet is making that wheel controllable - some circuits in the manuals do require you to turn it. That's high in the todo list (with mobile support).
I also really want to share all of the videos I've been collecting of similar "wheels" - in (modern-ish) elevators [0] and light shows [1]... And also pinball machines! [2]
Re: RadioShack boards, I did have the "300 in 1" kit growing up, so yes... it's full circle for me. :-)
Ah yes, I have a stack of these; lovely things for kids to learn some basic stuff. They are the oldest systems I own and they still work (they are fairly easy to fix).
Amazing! I don’t think I’ve heard of anyone owning many..!
1) Are any of them for sale? :)
2) Would you be open to recording a clean sound of one of its relays turning on and off? And helping me figure out some specifics about the motor wheel (its speed and whether it experiences any speed up)
Interesting: the entry for the Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) indicates it used integrated circuits—I had remembered hearing it used RTL (resistor-transistor logic).
It turns out both are true [1]. The "integrated circuits" were sort of "flat-packs" of RTL circuits. I had forgotten that early IC's were not quite what we envision today. Regardless I suppose ICs were RTL before they were TTL (before they were CMOS, etc.).
While snarky, I see where you're coming from. Sometimes a lot of the fun is in the building of a thing to understand how it works. Learning how a thing works from the user-facing side of the control panel is, for some of us, less rewarding.
If anything though, I want to go build a physical relay computer mechanism myself now (if even just a 4-bit adder or something).
Ha, I really get the sentiment! I do recommend perusing the Book 1 manual [0], towards the end there are a number of small problems (on page 30). They're worth tinkering with :-)
Thank you so much everyone, this is something I've worked on for a few years on and off -- I posted about it here in a Show HN a few hours ago [0]
The biggest unlock was finding Willy McAllister's excellent Circuit Sandbox [1], which provides the Minivac Simulator's underlying electrical math. I tried so many approaches to simulate electricity (a doomed DIY approach, Falstad, Spice...) but Circuit Sandbox's DC analysis did the job perfectly.
Ping me for questions, and would love to read your feedback!
[0] https://spinningnumbers.org/a/circuit-sandbox.html
Super cool. And thanks for links to the original manuals for those that want to take a deep dive.
Feature request: I was wanting for a bit more sound… I mean, when I see "relay computer", I'm heading there for lots of soft clicks.
More…?! :)
I totally feel you - the one reservation is that I’m using (gasp) not the original Minivac Relay sound. I need to go to a Computer Museum that will let me record one to offer a more authentic simulated experience.
So tldr - let me get a clean real sound and then we can come back to this question :)
2 replies →
Here's a demonstration of a 1958 relay computer.
https://youtu.be/_j544ELauus?t=373
Thanks!
The Enigma-cracking Bombe (on display at the extraordinary Bletchley Museum of Computing) also used relays
https://www.tnmoc.org/bh-10-bombe-description
And the Z3 as well!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z3_(computer)
It's almost hard to believe this is possible now in a modern web browser. It's a really sublime thing and I'm glad someone figured out a way to do this. I remember Web 1.0 before the days of JavaScript and P.H.P. allowed interactive websites... Indeed, it's entirely different now.
When you attach a name as inventor of something, it sounds as if the whole concept was borne by them, which is not true. All "inventors" and "great leaders" are only carriers of incremental change, which sometimes marks a milestone for a series of changes done by their predecessors or the context.
Steam engine concepts were already there before Jame Watt, logic by electrical circuits was already there before Shannon. People provide incremental guidance for the change, like river banks do to the flow of the river. No single part of the river brought the river upto that point.
It says, "Designed by Claude Shannon" (at least now it does) - did it formally say invented or what's put the bee in your bonnet?
There are many cases when the incremental change that is due to an individual inventor is very clearly defined, so it is known precisely which is the contribution beyond what was inherited from the predecessors.
For that incremental change, the name of its inventor is appropriate.
However, you are right that too frequently people fail to distinguish what was new and what was old in an invention, and they misleadingly attach the name of the inventor/discoverer to the entire big system or theory, not to the small features that are truly new.
The inventors or discoverers are frequently guilty of this themselves, by failing to properly acknowledge their sources and by making exaggerated patent claims, which nowadays are too frequently accepted by patent offices that do not perform an adequate search of prior art.
well the fact that you can wire the Rotary Switch to power and the thing physically rotates --- that's definitely Haptic Feedback that i dont ever recall seeing in a computer. lol.
that manual is wild too. entire section on games.
reminds me a lot of those old radioshack "build your own circuit" boards. the wires to components especially but also the manual, the way it just builds up dozens of examples from simple to complex, so if you really wanted to, a child could work their way through it slowly and understand everything.
looks like the inflation adjusted cost would be around 900 bucks today.
The Rotary Switch - which is both input and output in the real Minivac - is absolutely wild yeah.
One of the crucial things I didn't get to yet is making that wheel controllable - some circuits in the manuals do require you to turn it. That's high in the todo list (with mobile support).
I also really want to share all of the videos I've been collecting of similar "wheels" - in (modern-ish) elevators [0] and light shows [1]... And also pinball machines! [2]
Re: RadioShack boards, I did have the "300 in 1" kit growing up, so yes... it's full circle for me. :-)
[0] https://www.instagram.com/reel/C3dk5GkJni6/ and https://www.instagram.com/reel/CzuHXKRpuN-/
[1] https://www.instagram.com/reel/C6qqCdhJbM2/
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ue-1JoJQaEgm
Ah yes, I have a stack of these; lovely things for kids to learn some basic stuff. They are the oldest systems I own and they still work (they are fairly easy to fix).
Amazing! I don’t think I’ve heard of anyone owning many..!
1) Are any of them for sale? :)
2) Would you be open to recording a clean sound of one of its relays turning on and off? And helping me figure out some specifics about the motor wheel (its speed and whether it experiences any speed up)
Thank you! My email is:
hi at greg.technology
I am currently on vacation, but when back I will contact you.
"Before microchips existed, computers were built with mechanical relays." Should probably say something about vacuum tubes as well!
And discrete transistors. Now that my curiosity is piqued, I found this nice timeline:
https://www.computerhistory.org/timeline/computers/
It looks like transistorized computers were dominant at the point when integrated circuits were introduced.
Interesting: the entry for the Apollo Guidance Computer (AGC) indicates it used integrated circuits—I had remembered hearing it used RTL (resistor-transistor logic).
It turns out both are true [1]. The "integrated circuits" were sort of "flat-packs" of RTL circuits. I had forgotten that early IC's were not quite what we envision today. Regardless I suppose ICs were RTL before they were TTL (before they were CMOS, etc.).
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Guidance_Computer#Logic...
And before that with gears! (With limited success.)
3 replies →
I like how the 1937 "Model K" adder is literally on a breadboard.
(are those knife switches in the upper right?)
shameless plug https://github.com/artemonster/relay-cpu a great and useless hobby project :) 10/10 would do again
Do NOT overlook the manual .PDFs. They are crazy awesome. These people cared about what they were doing.
Relay computers must have been pretty loud with all those clacking mechanical switches.
They were, and some are still in use in legacy traffic control systems.
https://youtu.be/YDU47MxfHnQ
I imagine it would be easier for me to build the simulator than to make it do anything of interest.
While snarky, I see where you're coming from. Sometimes a lot of the fun is in the building of a thing to understand how it works. Learning how a thing works from the user-facing side of the control panel is, for some of us, less rewarding.
If anything though, I want to go build a physical relay computer mechanism myself now (if even just a 4-bit adder or something).
Ha, I really get the sentiment! I do recommend perusing the Book 1 manual [0], towards the end there are a number of small problems (on page 30). They're worth tinkering with :-)
[0] https://minivac.greg.technology/manuals/1961-minivac601-book...