Comment by IshKebab
7 hours ago
It has plenty of reasons to be inaccurate. They may be exaggerating the promise of LFP or overplaying how many secondary parents there are.
7 hours ago
It has plenty of reasons to be inaccurate. They may be exaggerating the promise of LFP or overplaying how many secondary parents there are.
Anyone who needs their help already knows the promise of LFP in at least enough details that they would need the patent search anyway as part of their efforts to learn if it is right for them. All secondary patents are important, the only question is: do you license them, work around them, or not infringe in the first place. (I'm going to ignore the possibility of intentional infringing though that happens)