Comment by A4ET8a8uTh0_v2

<< I’m not sure what you’re trying to say by this.

I read the paper and I was interested in the concepts it presented. I am turning those around in my head as I try to incorporate some of them into my existing personal project.

What I am trying to say is that I am currently processing. In a sense, this forum serves to preserve some of that processing.

<< And a paper which is made in a way in which it intentionally can’t be reproduced or falsified isn’t a scientific paper IMO.

Obligatory, then we can dismiss most of the papers these days, I suppose.

FWIW, I am not really arguing against you. In some ways I agree with you, because we are clearly not living in 'no BS' land. But I am hesitant over what the paper implies.