← Back to context Comment by pegor 1 day ago Definitely would be more functional with more of the GPIOs exposed. 3 comments pegor Reply forsalebypwner 20 hours ago If you want an ESP32 dev board with GPIOs exposed there are dozens (or hundreds, maybe thousands) of other options out there. It makes sense not to expose them when you're going for the smallest possible footprint. stavros 7 hours ago I don't know, I see enough space for four GPIOs there. Not holes, obviously, but pads should be very workable. imtringued 6 hours ago It could be even smaller without that USB C port and have more GPIO pads.
forsalebypwner 20 hours ago If you want an ESP32 dev board with GPIOs exposed there are dozens (or hundreds, maybe thousands) of other options out there. It makes sense not to expose them when you're going for the smallest possible footprint. stavros 7 hours ago I don't know, I see enough space for four GPIOs there. Not holes, obviously, but pads should be very workable. imtringued 6 hours ago It could be even smaller without that USB C port and have more GPIO pads.
stavros 7 hours ago I don't know, I see enough space for four GPIOs there. Not holes, obviously, but pads should be very workable.
If you want an ESP32 dev board with GPIOs exposed there are dozens (or hundreds, maybe thousands) of other options out there. It makes sense not to expose them when you're going for the smallest possible footprint.
I don't know, I see enough space for four GPIOs there. Not holes, obviously, but pads should be very workable.
It could be even smaller without that USB C port and have more GPIO pads.