Good point, we human definitely have defects too. I’ll reflect on this, though this doesn’t make me consider that chip inferences to be fully analog to what happen in humans when they are thinking (or any animal/entity ongoing a thought process).
Yeah, fair. I'm just not generally a fan of the perfect world fallacy. Something might not be perfect, but it still might be as good as the alternative.
Good point, we human definitely have defects too. I’ll reflect on this, though this doesn’t make me consider that chip inferences to be fully analog to what happen in humans when they are thinking (or any animal/entity ongoing a thought process).
Yeah, fair. I'm just not generally a fan of the perfect world fallacy. Something might not be perfect, but it still might be as good as the alternative.