Comment by latexr
2 hours ago
Edit: I was wrong, I misread “purchase” as “purchased” which aligned with my (flawed) memory of what happened and it made sense with the full sentence. Original comment remains below.
It’s not without precedent.
https://www.npr.org/2024/01/18/1225432506/apple-watch-blood-...
The example you provided is exactly the opposite:
> no longer be available on newly purchased Apple Watch ... > customers who purchase the watches in the U.S. will still be able to see Apple's Blood Oxygen app
Edit: I misread “purchase” as “purchased”, which is wrong.
You’re removing the important part. Here’s the full sentence, with emphasis:
> According to the tech giant, customers who purchase the watches in the U.S. will still be able to see Apple's Blood Oxygen app on their devices, but when tapped, users will get a message saying the feature is no longer available.
In other words, you saw the icon for the app but it didn’t work. The feature had been removed even for those who had already paid for it.
> the ability to measure blood oxygen levels will no longer be available on newly purchased Apple Watch Series 9 and Watch Ultra 2 models
It says that was on new watches, it doesn't say they retroactively removed the feature from old watches.
1 reply →
True. Still not exactly feature removed after purchase.
Also this was regulatory pressure which is more like act of god in legalese while removal of h265 is more like we decided to screw customers.
If and only if they indeed removed the feature after purchase.
1 reply →