← Back to context

Comment by crossbody

12 days ago

Dude, who cares about study design and methodological validity! Let's just burn Meta down and put Zuck to jail! /s

What you a saying is valid criticism of the study but people here already made up their mind, so they downvote.

Another point to add is that 1 week is way too short - assuming there is an effect it might disappear or go in reverse after 1 month.

To all downvoters: if you think of yourself as smart rational people, please just use search/AI to see for yourself whether there is high quality evidence of _causal_ impact of social media on kids/mental health. The results are mixed at best.

Interestingly the post is climbing it's way back to zero.

I find the downvote without counterargument to be an odd response to a good faith post. It seems like it would strengthen the argument if the message they send is "I don't have a counter to this but I don't like it and I don't like that others will see this point of view"

I have come to realise that I have a much higher threshold when it comes to upvoting, downvoting, or rating things. It seems like a lot of people freely upvote, like, heart, or downvote without a care. We live in a world where a 4.8 star rating (comprised entirely of an aggregate of zero and five star ratings) is considered a concern. So I try not to be bothered by it, but I'm pretty sure subconsciously a downvote hurts more than someone saying "I disagree"