← Back to context

Comment by JAlexoid

5 days ago

That's the inherent limit on the models, that makes humans still relevant.

With the current state of architectures and training methods - they are very unlikely to be the source of new ideas. They are effectively huge librarians for accumulated knowledge, rather than true AI.

Then again, an unintelligent human librarian would be nowhere near as useful as a good LLM.

Current LLMs exist somewhere between "unintelligent/unthinking" and "true AI," but lack of agreement on what any of these terms mean is keeping us from classifying them properly.