← Back to context

Comment by NoboruWataya

4 days ago

The article doesn't generally read like AI to me, though I can't discount the possibility that I have been fooled by a new and more advanced slop machine.

I think HN is probably biased towards a subset of the population that is perennially interested in nuclear explosions. They surely occupied a much greater part of the public consciousness in the 50s than they do today (and certainly much greater than a few years ago, before a nuclear power invaded Europe).

There is also very high overlap with engineers and guns.

Also jet engines.

But yes, things going boom too.