Well that's sure an argument. You get that I'm not the one who accused him, right? What you think of me has literally nothing to do with the claims Henry de Valence made. My guess is that these two documents (or maybe just the one you posted) are literally the first time you ever heard that name. Am I right?
Well that's sure an argument. You get that I'm not the one who accused him, right? What you think of me has literally nothing to do with the claims Henry de Valence made. My guess is that these two documents (or maybe just the one you posted) are literally the first time you ever heard that name. Am I right?
Very very incorrect.
EDIT: Adding more to my post here because it would be hypocritical for you to complain:
1. I feel like given how I can make accurate predictions about Henry’s sphere of influence, that might gain me a little credibility: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45495180
2. The reason I insulted you is because I know for a fact that when the mob came and demanded you shun and persecute someone, you caved.
de Valence accuses Bernstein of specific academic misconduct and you come back with this Encyclopedia Dramatica stuff? Why bother commenting at all?
I don't think "I insulted you because" is ever a good way to start an HN comment, for what it's worth, but thanks for laying your cards on the table.
2 replies →