Comment by marcosdumay
4 days ago
You seem to not be operating in good faith, but that one is interesting:
> Then perhaps a larger amount of TNT
You can replicate something on the size of the WWII bombs with TNT, but you can't get anything much larger. A TNT explosion is relatively slow, and if you blow too much of it, it will disperse before blowing.
Or other types of explosives that mushroom with lights and colors. We've seen real life examples of those. I'm just trying to have a controversial discussion while following HN rules and vibes. No politics, just facts. I didn't provide references hoping some curious mind would go searching for the truth themselves. Compelling evidence is out there. For example
> No politics, just facts.
Not a lot of facts, as most of your comment is trivial to disprove.
> Image comparisons between Tokyo and Hiroshima/Nagasaki destructions are extremely identical
The destruction in Tokyo is completely different from Hiroshima/Nagasaki. It's not centralized, and there's no mark of the extreme high temperatures the nuclear weapons create.
> Both Nagasaki and Hiroshima are harbor cities, which explains implanting the large amounts of TNT.
The place where the explosions happened is completely clear from the remains you can find there today. You can just get some satellite images and look.
You are clearly going for a "wake up sheep!" comment, so go and wake up.
I'm open to discussion. If I see compelling evidence I could change my mind. Unfortunately I don't believe there is anything called "nuclear weapons". Just nuclear energy. Anyway that's old news. The new race is AI. Soon there is going to be a major event claiming to be AI superiority that will seem like magic. If that happens, I hope you remember my comment.
1 reply →