← Back to context

Comment by ACCount37

3 days ago

You don't get it at all, do you?

"Implements the same math" IS the similarity.

I'm baffled that someone in CS, a field ruled by applied abstraction, has to be explained over and over again that abstraction is a thing that exists.

In case you have missed it in the middle of the navel-gazing about abstraction, this all started with the comment "Please stop comparing these things to biological systems. They have very little in common."[0]

If you insist on continuing to miss the point even when told explicitly that the comment is referring to what's inside the box, not its interface, then be my guest. There isn't much of a sensible discussion about engineering to be had with someone who thinks that e.g. the sentence "Please stop comparing [nuclear reactors] to [coal power plants]. They have very little in common" can be countered with "but abstraction! they both produce electricity!".

For the record, I am not the one you have been replying to.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46053563

  • You are missing the point once again.

    They have "very little in common", except for the fact that they perform the same kind of operations.