← Back to context

Comment by petersellers

2 days ago

> All I am saying is it is their project, their blog. They can be however much rude they want to be on their website. It's their website, their lines and their boundaries.

That's funny, because if that is true he violated his own code of conduct: https://ziglang.org/code-of-conduct/#safe-constructive-only

> I do but I decline to share it here

The point is that everyone has different lines for what they consider to be "acceptable" or not. That is exactly the reason why codes of conduct exist - it's an attempt to find a common denomiator so that it can help foster a community where people can feel included without feeling like they are being attacked or insulted.

11 comments

petersellers

Reply
throwaway150  2 days ago

> That's funny, because if that is true he violated his own code of conduct

Yes, he did. It is funny. I don't know why we need to talk endlessly about it. If you are bothered so much by this violation, file an official report on their issue tracker.

> The point is that everyone has different lines for what they consider to be "acceptable" or not. That is exactly the reason why codes of conduct exist

When I said I decline to share my lines and boundaries here, I meant just that. I didn't mean that I need a lecture on CoC from you. I know what CoCs are and why they exist. Thank you very much. I am not morality police. Neither are you.

My morality applies to myself. Andrew's morality applies to himself. But yeah... CoC may apply to him too. So you've got a good point. I don't know if the CoC applies to their website. If you know more and if it does, a violation of CoC should be reported on their issue tracker. If this is such an important topic for you, please do report the violation to them. That'd be fair.

  • petersellers  2 days ago

    > Yes, he did. It is funny.

    Yeah, it’s hilarious! Calling someone a monkey is such a clever and thought provoking insult!

    > I don't know why we need to talk endlessly about it

    If you are confused by this, why are you continuing to respond?

    > When I said I decline to share my lines and boundaries here, I meant just that. I didn't mean that I need a lecture on CoC from you. I know what CoCs are and why they exist.

    I really don’t think you know why CoC’s exist, because you are chastising people when they point out a legitimate violation (e.g. being the "morality police").

    > But yeah... CoC applies to him too. So you've got a good point

    Thanks for finally admitting this, I guess? Not sure why you needed to add all the extra argumentation about it, but at least you got there eventually.

    > If this is such an important topic for you, please do report the violation to them

    No thank you. I’m not actually offended by what he said, I just find it weird when people rush to his defense on this.

    • throwaway150  2 days ago

      > If you are confused by this, why are you continuing to respond?

      I'm not confused by anything. That was a rhetorical question. I continue to respond because there are other things that I care about and I have things to say about that. I don't care about what style or tone or words Andrew choses on their website. But I care about people trying to be morality police and discouraging someone blogging on their own website from writing rudely and writing politically incorrectly. So that's why I continue to respond.

      > Thanks for finally admitting this, I guess? Not sure why you needed to add all the extra argumentation about it, but at least you got there eventually.

      Credit where credit is due. If you make good points I agree with, I'll certainly say that.

      > Not sure why you needed to add all the extra argumentation about it, but at least you got there eventually.

      Because there are other points of yours I don't agree with.

      Must a person always 100% agree or 100% disagree? Can a person not 10% agree and 90% disagree? The latter is happening here.

      4 replies →

throwawaymaths  2 days ago

read the CoC carefully, it says which spaces are governed by it. the website does not seem to be. that's deliberate, the CoC only applies to "working" spaces.