← Back to context Comment by ml-anon 2 days ago ok so no evidence of highly illegal mass gender based discrimination. 1 comment ml-anon Reply lelanthran 1 day ago > ok so no evidence of highly illegal mass gender based discrimination.This seems like a very roundabout way of saying there was no evidence of discrimination against women :-/Where are you going with this? Because if "no evidence == did not happen", then that's true for the decades prior to the 90s, right?
lelanthran 1 day ago > ok so no evidence of highly illegal mass gender based discrimination.This seems like a very roundabout way of saying there was no evidence of discrimination against women :-/Where are you going with this? Because if "no evidence == did not happen", then that's true for the decades prior to the 90s, right?
> ok so no evidence of highly illegal mass gender based discrimination.
This seems like a very roundabout way of saying there was no evidence of discrimination against women :-/
Where are you going with this? Because if "no evidence == did not happen", then that's true for the decades prior to the 90s, right?