← Back to context

Comment by chasil

1 day ago

I think the same subject was addressed in both of these...

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46011889

The first one "220" has a nice discussion, in particular a comment by pfdietz:

> It increases the rate of production of neutral antihydrogen from antiprotons and positrons by a factor of 8. It doesn't increase the efficiency of production of antiprotons, which is the extremely inefficient, energy intensive part.