← Back to context

Comment by fooker

2 months ago

The difference between a bomb and a reactor is just clever engineering.

It's much easier to make a fission reactor than a fission bomb, and much easier to make a fusion bomb than a fusion reaction. They are not even that similar.

  • It's way easier to make a fission bomb than a fission reactor. I reactor has to stay in the very narrow window where it's critical but not prompt critical. Even pure fission bombs can be marvels of engineering but the simplest gun-type bomb is easier to build than the simplest nuclear reactor.

    • Without a precisely timed neutron initiator you'll get a fizzle. Either way, gun-type bombs require highly enriched uranium. A simple reactor can be literally just brickwork of natural uranium and graphite.

      Reactors are much much simpler to pull off, which is why US had the first reactor whole 2.5 years before a nuclear bomb.

      2 replies →