← Back to context Comment by nchmy 4 hours ago no,it quite literally doesnt... 7 comments nchmy Reply dundarious 3 hours ago The central complaint of TFA is the exact same as what ruined is doing. It is very obviously a joke. Not something I appreciate on HN, but still. andy99 2 hours ago I think it was a good enough joke or witty remark grounded in the crux of the article that it’s worth it. And it’s certainly interesting to see the “whoosh” past many of the commenters dundarious 2 hours ago It was flagged and I vouched it for similar reasons. I downvote such comments though. natch 40 minutes ago whoosh ruined 3 hours ago a remarkable assertion from nchmy
dundarious 3 hours ago The central complaint of TFA is the exact same as what ruined is doing. It is very obviously a joke. Not something I appreciate on HN, but still. andy99 2 hours ago I think it was a good enough joke or witty remark grounded in the crux of the article that it’s worth it. And it’s certainly interesting to see the “whoosh” past many of the commenters dundarious 2 hours ago It was flagged and I vouched it for similar reasons. I downvote such comments though.
andy99 2 hours ago I think it was a good enough joke or witty remark grounded in the crux of the article that it’s worth it. And it’s certainly interesting to see the “whoosh” past many of the commenters dundarious 2 hours ago It was flagged and I vouched it for similar reasons. I downvote such comments though.
dundarious 2 hours ago It was flagged and I vouched it for similar reasons. I downvote such comments though.
The central complaint of TFA is the exact same as what ruined is doing. It is very obviously a joke. Not something I appreciate on HN, but still.
I think it was a good enough joke or witty remark grounded in the crux of the article that it’s worth it. And it’s certainly interesting to see the “whoosh” past many of the commenters
It was flagged and I vouched it for similar reasons. I downvote such comments though.
whoosh
a remarkable assertion from nchmy