Comment by otterley
3 months ago
> As for working set size, that is always merely the height of the B+tree.
This statement makes no sense to me. Are you using a different definition of "working set" than the rest of us? A working set size is application and access pattern dependent.
> It will always be far more efficient than any other DB under the same conditions
That depends on how broadly or narrowly one defines "same conditions" :-)
Identical hardware, same RAM size, same data volume.
That’s a bold claim. Are you saying that LMDB outperforms every other database on the same hardware, regardless of access pattern? And if so, is there proof of this?
Plenty of proof. http://www.lmdb.tech/bench/
3 replies →