Comment by bagacrap

Agreed, except s/know/think. It's possible that there are some false positives in my detection algorithm, that I tune out just because someone's prose style has that undercurrent of blandness characteristic of LLMs. But I suppose if we're talking about "art" and not, for example, technical documentation, that's no great loss --- bland writing isn't worth recreationally reading.

It does seem that LLMs could avoid this detection with some superficial tweaks such as injecting poor grammar and reducing peppiness. I hope it doesn't get to the point that I have to become suspicious of all text.