Comment by bigbadfeline

> Everyone knows that US presidents are not kings.

That's an interesting argument. Perhaps you think the tea party movement was about making tea or a literal party?

> No Kings did not do anything to really get media attention

You're the second person here who uses media attention as a metric for the validity of political ideas. However, the media isn't groomed or fed by the people which results in a strong inverse correlation between media attention and what's good for the people.

> At best they stretch their powers... and most of their actions can be quickly undone by the next deep state puppet.

A fail to see the good news here, for one, undoing actions doesn't mean relinquishing accumulated powers, in fact it may be used as an excuse for grabbing even more powers.

More importantly, you assume that all changes are not only reversible but easily so, and the new "reverse" is always better than the original - not one of these is true.

> Bad managers/directors come and go.

And so do the companies they lead. It sounds like you are OK with letting America go, I'm not sure you understand the difference in scale and risk.

> I can speed up their departure or just simply ignore them and wait for their replacement.

There's no bright future to wait for, waiting and navel gazing surrenders the future to those who don't do it.