← Back to context

Comment by raxxorraxor

3 months ago

You don't know what you are talking about. Read up on freedom of speech, the threat of consequences violates the principle directly.

In my example the mean tweet was a insult towards the attacker, which netted her a higher sentence than the rapist got. These laws are neither desirable, nor sensible, nor just. What is actually empty is a definition about how speech gets prosecuted. It stems from older times and is abused for newer vanity, stupidity and autocratic ambitions.