← Back to context Comment by tcfhgj 2 months ago People are motivated to replace it with something better, it's called Matrix 2.0. 11 comments tcfhgj Reply this_user 2 months ago Which perfectly fits the Matrix ethos of everything constantly being rewritten or replaced with something new that only implements half the features before the original thing is ever finished. oblio 2 months ago https://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.htmlCopy-paste the link, otherwise the Easter egg might be offensive to some :-D tcfhgj 2 months ago I like this more than sticking to things you know you won't be happy with. Orygin 2 months ago Do they plan to fix the fundamental issues of Matrix in 2.0 or should I wait for 3.0? tcfhgj 2 months ago you could be less vague Orygin 2 months ago I could, that's why the link has a few more words about the issues with matrix. 1 reply → Jnr 2 months ago I tried it a year ago when it was introduced, it did not work. Is it stable now? tcfhgj 2 months ago Matrix 2.0?Not quite yet, but it was promised that the next release will be Matrix 2.0 Jnr 2 months ago I guess it was the Element X client that was advertised as Matrix 2.0 client and that did not work. 1 reply →
this_user 2 months ago Which perfectly fits the Matrix ethos of everything constantly being rewritten or replaced with something new that only implements half the features before the original thing is ever finished. oblio 2 months ago https://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.htmlCopy-paste the link, otherwise the Easter egg might be offensive to some :-D tcfhgj 2 months ago I like this more than sticking to things you know you won't be happy with.
oblio 2 months ago https://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.htmlCopy-paste the link, otherwise the Easter egg might be offensive to some :-D
Orygin 2 months ago Do they plan to fix the fundamental issues of Matrix in 2.0 or should I wait for 3.0? tcfhgj 2 months ago you could be less vague Orygin 2 months ago I could, that's why the link has a few more words about the issues with matrix. 1 reply →
tcfhgj 2 months ago you could be less vague Orygin 2 months ago I could, that's why the link has a few more words about the issues with matrix. 1 reply →
Orygin 2 months ago I could, that's why the link has a few more words about the issues with matrix. 1 reply →
Jnr 2 months ago I tried it a year ago when it was introduced, it did not work. Is it stable now? tcfhgj 2 months ago Matrix 2.0?Not quite yet, but it was promised that the next release will be Matrix 2.0 Jnr 2 months ago I guess it was the Element X client that was advertised as Matrix 2.0 client and that did not work. 1 reply →
tcfhgj 2 months ago Matrix 2.0?Not quite yet, but it was promised that the next release will be Matrix 2.0 Jnr 2 months ago I guess it was the Element X client that was advertised as Matrix 2.0 client and that did not work. 1 reply →
Jnr 2 months ago I guess it was the Element X client that was advertised as Matrix 2.0 client and that did not work. 1 reply →
Which perfectly fits the Matrix ethos of everything constantly being rewritten or replaced with something new that only implements half the features before the original thing is ever finished.
https://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html
Copy-paste the link, otherwise the Easter egg might be offensive to some :-D
I like this more than sticking to things you know you won't be happy with.
Do they plan to fix the fundamental issues of Matrix in 2.0 or should I wait for 3.0?
you could be less vague
I could, that's why the link has a few more words about the issues with matrix.
1 reply →
I tried it a year ago when it was introduced, it did not work. Is it stable now?
Matrix 2.0?
Not quite yet, but it was promised that the next release will be Matrix 2.0
I guess it was the Element X client that was advertised as Matrix 2.0 client and that did not work.
1 reply →