← Back to context Comment by andhuman 3 months ago This is big. The first really big open weights model that understands images. 5 comments andhuman Reply yoavm 3 months ago How is this different from Llama 3.2 "vision capabilities"?https://www.llama.com/docs/how-to-guides/vision-capabilities... Havoc 3 months ago Guessing GP commenter considers Apache more "open" than Meta's license. Which to be fair isn't terrible but also not quite as clean as straight apache mesebrec 3 months ago Llama's license explicitly disallows its usage in the EU.If that doesn't even meet the threshold for "terrible", then what does? 2 replies →
yoavm 3 months ago How is this different from Llama 3.2 "vision capabilities"?https://www.llama.com/docs/how-to-guides/vision-capabilities... Havoc 3 months ago Guessing GP commenter considers Apache more "open" than Meta's license. Which to be fair isn't terrible but also not quite as clean as straight apache mesebrec 3 months ago Llama's license explicitly disallows its usage in the EU.If that doesn't even meet the threshold for "terrible", then what does? 2 replies →
Havoc 3 months ago Guessing GP commenter considers Apache more "open" than Meta's license. Which to be fair isn't terrible but also not quite as clean as straight apache mesebrec 3 months ago Llama's license explicitly disallows its usage in the EU.If that doesn't even meet the threshold for "terrible", then what does? 2 replies →
mesebrec 3 months ago Llama's license explicitly disallows its usage in the EU.If that doesn't even meet the threshold for "terrible", then what does? 2 replies →
How is this different from Llama 3.2 "vision capabilities"?
https://www.llama.com/docs/how-to-guides/vision-capabilities...
Guessing GP commenter considers Apache more "open" than Meta's license. Which to be fair isn't terrible but also not quite as clean as straight apache
Llama's license explicitly disallows its usage in the EU.
If that doesn't even meet the threshold for "terrible", then what does?
2 replies →