← Back to context

Comment by avadodin

2 days ago

I do not deeply disagree with your statement but I do not see the two as exclusive.

I think distributed public ownership placed in a corporation ruled as proposed here provides a chance to harvest residual good decisions from a citizen/shareholder who cares as opposed to having a single decision derived from some other issue a majority of citizens favor.

Unless you're talking about doing away with any kind of voting but Communism doesn't exactly have a stellar track record.