← Back to context Comment by artemonster 5 hours ago I know what TCO is. Screw the "beauty", honestly. I want to see at least one real world use case 2 comments artemonster Reply creata 3 hours ago There isn't a killer use case, because tail calls (to yourself or to siblings) can always be easily converted to a loop, and the loop is more idiomatic in most mainstream languages. jhgb 1 hour ago ...and that costs you code modularity and separate compilation. Why lose them when you don't have to?
creata 3 hours ago There isn't a killer use case, because tail calls (to yourself or to siblings) can always be easily converted to a loop, and the loop is more idiomatic in most mainstream languages. jhgb 1 hour ago ...and that costs you code modularity and separate compilation. Why lose them when you don't have to?
jhgb 1 hour ago ...and that costs you code modularity and separate compilation. Why lose them when you don't have to?
There isn't a killer use case, because tail calls (to yourself or to siblings) can always be easily converted to a loop, and the loop is more idiomatic in most mainstream languages.
...and that costs you code modularity and separate compilation. Why lose them when you don't have to?