← Back to context

Comment by jen729w

3 hours ago

Sounds like he’s a twat.

Isn't falling for virtue signalling charity donations more of a twattery?

  • It is always enlightening when people criticizing "virtue signaling" accidentally reveal that the problem they have is not the signaling, it's the having virtue.

    • There was a time when one of the virtues was not to brag about how virtuous you were. I think that's why a lot of folks have a problem with virtue signalling. In their minds if you're signalling by doing something publicly it karmically negates what you're doing and almost alchemically turns it into something resembling vice.

      I'm merely trying to explain how it is that people can have a problem with virtue signalling and to them it doesn't really contradict what is to them true virtue where you do something good and stay quiet about it.

      1 reply →

  • If you choose to classify all charity donations as "virtue signaling", yes.

    If you reject that absurd false framing, no.

  • It's not virtue signally if you're tangible helping people. Like if I give away food, maybe I have the intent of signalling something, but I'm also giving away food. That actually happened.

    The world would be a much better place if rich people virtue signalled much more and thereby donated more.