← Back to context Comment by djmips 2 months ago I think you strengthened their point. 1 comment djmips Reply vouwfietsman 2 months ago I don't think I did. The implication is that using languages with strong types (as discussed in the article) is not a solution. That's rubbish. It's at least part of the solution.
vouwfietsman 2 months ago I don't think I did. The implication is that using languages with strong types (as discussed in the article) is not a solution. That's rubbish. It's at least part of the solution.
I don't think I did. The implication is that using languages with strong types (as discussed in the article) is not a solution. That's rubbish. It's at least part of the solution.