Are We over the "Jaws Effect?"

2 months ago (nautil.us)

A woman got bitten by a shark pretty bad down the street from me about a mile away when I lived there: https://abc7.com/post/newport-beach-shark-bite-victim-recove...

I understand they are out there, I understand there is an ecosystem and they are important to that ecosystem... all that goes out the window when you see a great white cruising through the water. We're cool as long as they are out at sea and not where I'm at.

Diver and conservationist Cristina Zenato showed another side to sharks: they come to her to have hooks removed from their mouths...

https://youtu.be/G8LmxwOgBhA

If that's real, and not anthropomorphized, it shows that sharks are complex creatures, not mindless predators.

And it also tragically shows how much damage we humans do to the natural world. Sport fishing? Not so much for the fish...

  • That video speaks to shark behavior, but equally as much to Zebato's risk tolerance.

    She seems a little too close for comfort to Timothy Treadwell https://youtu.be/watch?v=uWA7GtDmNFU

    • At a first glance, sure. And more at risk than I am, behind my monitor in the middle of the US.

      But unlike Timothy, she doesn't appear to be a batshit-insane, risktaking showoff. She doesn't claim, nor act like, sharks are her friends.

  • Even if you don't anthropomorphize (if that's possible) - shark actual behaviour is miles apart from the stereotypes.

    Imagine if shark outer appearance were more mammal-cute, but they'd kept their behaviour - they'd be cuddly super stars with a stellar reputation!

> In an online survey of 371 people, mostly from Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom

I'm pretty sure that's not a significant enough sample size to matter.

  • Depends, if they're representative / a good cross-section it'd be statistically significant enough. That said, I wonder how they get these surveys; there's a number of "get paid pennies to fill in a survey for studies" schemes out there, I can well imagine the quality of the responses of those is not great.

People get killed by sharks in Australia regularly (two last week I think).

But I don’t think the public sees sharks as monsters to be destroyed.

Sharks are wild animals and we are in their habitat.

Sharks deserve protection even if they eat people.

I listened to a yogi talking about mindfulness. He mentioned a session he had with a woman where they where working on the concept of flow. The woman had an experience of flow when she was bitten by a shark. She said that if she could make a drink that would create that feeling she would addicted the world. I think about that sometimes.

  • That's reminiscent of Livingstone's description of the time he was mauled by a lion:

    "The shock produced a stupor similar to that which seems to be felt by a mouse after the first shake of the cat. It caused a sort of dreaminess, in which there was no sense of pain nor feeling of terror, though quite conscious of all that was happening."

    https://historyweblog.com/2014/10/lion-attacks-livingstone/

Anecdotally, people's fear of sharks still feels very overblown. I've gone surfing in SoCal a couple times a month for the last 5 years or so, I've never known anyone that's had a shark attack, and have only been told "there's a shark nearby" once. On the other hand, many friends have hit rocks, got caught in rip currents, and or had stingray stings. Even though the severity of these things is less than a shark attack, their prevalence means that there are many more deaths every year due to these relatively mundane things. But when I offer to teach somebody to surf, sharks are still one of the most common objections (it's probably second to "I can't swim").

None of this contradicts what the study is saying -- it's totally possible that the overall fear is decreasing. It's just _still irrationally high_, imo.

As a Southern California kid in the 70s we were regular beach goers, my pal down the street as much as anyone. We went and saw Jaws in a drive in at about age 13. It didn't make a big impression on me, but he never went back in the ocean for the rest of his life, about 40 more years. He wasn't otherwise neurotic or phobic, but he got one-shot by Spielberg.

Jaws is the only movie (within reason I guess) that I don't let my 13 year old watch.

We live by the sea with one of the world's best marine reserves right off shore. There are plenty of fish including sharks living right off the beach and you need nothing more than a mask and snorkel to get right in amongst them.

When I watched Jaws as a kid when it first came out, it scared me shitless and I still carry some of that trauma whenever I am snorkeling over a deep canyon where the blue just goes on forever and you can't see the bottom.

I just don't want my child to miss out on that because of the ability of Hollywood to scare us.

  • > Jaws is the only movie (within reason I guess) that I don't let my 13 year old watch.

    On the other hand, I totally forgot about Sharknado until just now; that's my next movie night pick and my kid's gonna love it.

  • I'd recommend you watch Jaws again, or at least some clips of it, just to see how cheesy it feels now. It's lost its teeth imo

    • "Jaws lost its teeth"? I see what you did there.

      But yeah. I had the fortune to see Jaws on a bus in highland Bolivia (talk about a weird choice for forced onboard entertainment!), and it was more annoying than it was scary.

Sharks are apex predators and an integral part of the ecosystem. These two ideas are not contradictory.

  • Not what is being discussed.

    Orcas are apex predators (and feed on sharks, in fact). Grizzlies are apex predators that occasionally attack humans.

    But sharks are more akin to wolves: they live outside reality and statistics as a folklorish monster, just waiting to pull you under the waves or crossdress and eat you whole.

    It's about the irrational mythos, not their place in the real world.